Fact-checked comparison
Screenshotor vs ScreenshotAPI: pricing, features, and best fit
Screenshot automation API advertising full-page captures, PDF/video/GIF output, bulk and scheduled screenshots, cookie/ad blocking, authenticated pages, BYOB storage, no-code integrations, and text/HTML extraction. This article compares that public positioning with Screenshotor, a screenshot API built around async jobs, webhooks, dashboard history, temporary download URLs, and optional AI vision on completed captures.
Sources checked
Official competitor pages checked on 2026-05-28. Pricing changes often, so verify again before buying.
Quick verdict
Choose Screenshotor when the screenshot is part of your own product workflow: create a job, receive a webhook, store a result, and optionally ask AI to interpret the final image.
Why Screenshotor can be the better fit
- Screenshotor is simpler if the core need is URL screenshot capture plus optional AI visual analysis, not scheduling, video, or scraping-style extraction.
- Screenshotor keeps the app focused around API jobs, dashboard history, webhooks, and temporary image downloads.
- Screenshotor can be easier to explain inside a product where the screenshot is an AI input rather than a scheduled reporting product.
When ScreenshotAPI makes sense
ScreenshotAPI is not just a keyword target. It has real strengths, and the best choice depends on your workload.
- ScreenshotAPI.net has a broader public feature matrix around scheduling, bulk processing, videos, PDFs, HTML rendering, text extraction, and BYOB storage.
- Its Business tier publishes a 100,000-screenshot quota, which is above Screenshotor public self-serve tiers.
Pricing snapshot
Screenshot API pricing is rarely apples-to-apples. Compare fresh renders, cached hits, credits, AI calls, overages, and storage.
Screenshotor
- Free: 100 credits
- Starter: $9/month for 2,500 credits
- Pro: $29/month for 10,000 credits
- Scale: $99/month for 50,000 credits
ScreenshotAPI
7-day trial with 100 screenshots; paid monthly plans publicly list $9 for 1,000, $29 for 10,000, and $175 for 100,000 screenshots.
Fact-checked highlights
- Public pricing lists a 7-day trial with 100 screenshots, Essential at $9/month for 1,000, Startup at $29/month for 10,000, and Business at $175/month for 100,000.
- The pricing table includes full-page screenshots, ad/cookie banner blocking, Retina resolution, PNG/JPEG/WebP, PDF, HTML to image/PDF, bulk screenshots, and extract text/HTML.
- Feature pages advertise scheduled captures, bulk CSV/API workflows, scrolling video screenshots in GIF/MP4/WebM, cloud bucket routing, and integrations such as Zapier, Make, Google Sheets, and n8n.
- The public FAQ says cached screenshots do not count toward quota unless fresh rendering is requested.
Screenshotor at a glance
Screenshotor targets teams that want a modern REST workflow: create a capture, track status, download assets, and optionally attach AI analysis to the finished image.
- Async-first screenshot jobs. Create captures with POST /v1/screenshot, poll job status, list history, and fetch time-limited download URLs when rendering finishes.
- Optional AI vision on the rendered image. Turn on aiVision to send the completed PNG, JPG, or WEBP capture through OpenRouter vision models using your prompt, useful for summaries and structured extraction.
- Webhook delivery. Send webhookUrl to get notified when queued work completes so backends do not need tight polling loops.
- Safety-minded URL handling. DNS and network checks aim to reduce SSRF risk before navigation, with additional blocking options for private targets during browsing.
- Banner handling you control per request. Opt into bannerBlocking with hide, reject, or accept modes plus extra selectors for stubborn consent UI.
ScreenshotAPI at a glance
Screenshot automation API advertising full-page captures, PDF/video/GIF output, bulk and scheduled screenshots, cookie/ad blocking, authenticated pages, BYOB storage, no-code integrations, and text/HTML extraction.
When teams shortlist it
- You want scheduling, bulk URL batches, PDF/video/GIF output, text extraction, and no-code integrations in one vendor.
- You need BYOB cloud storage and workflows aimed at agencies, audits, monitoring, or competitive intelligence.
- You prefer a very broad screenshot automation suite over a narrower screenshot-plus-AI API.
Decision checklist
Use this table to decide whether you need Screenshotor's job and AI workflow or ScreenshotAPI's particular strengths.
| Topic | Screenshotor | ScreenshotAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing shape | Public self-serve tiers reach $99/month for 50,000 credits. | Public plans list $9/month for 1,000, $29/month for 10,000, and $175/month for 100,000 screenshots. |
| Workflow breadth | Focused on API capture jobs, webhooks, downloads, and AI vision. | Markets scheduled captures, bulk jobs, video formats, PDFs, HTML rendering, extraction, and storage integrations. |
| AI and extraction | OpenRouter vision analyzes the final image using your prompt. | Feature pages advertise extract_text and output=json for readable page text and metadata. |
| Best operational fit | Product teams adding screenshot capture and analysis to their own backend. | Teams that want a dashboard-centered automation suite for reports, schedules, batches, and storage routing. |
Questions teams ask before switching
Is Screenshotor a full ScreenshotAPI.net replacement?
Not for every workflow. ScreenshotAPI.net publicly advertises scheduling, bulk processing, PDF/video output, text extraction, and BYOB storage. Screenshotor is a better fit when you want screenshot jobs plus optional AI vision in a smaller API surface.
Which one is better for bulk scheduled screenshots?
ScreenshotAPI.net is the stronger shortlist when first-party scheduling and bulk URL workflows are mandatory. Screenshotor is better when your own application controls scheduling and only needs capture, webhook, download, and AI analysis.
How should I compare pricing?
Compare the exact number of fresh renders, cached hits, AI vision calls, storage needs, and output formats. The headline quotas are not the whole cost model.
More comparisons
Browse the full list on the comparison hub.